France

Membre depuis 1990

L'efficacité des mesures de lutte contre le blanchiment de capitaux et le financement du terrorisme et leur conformité avec les Recommandations du GAFI a été évalué en 2022.  Le rapport d'évaluation a conclu que la France dispose d'un cadre robuste et sophistiqué pour lutter contre le blanchiment de capitaux et le financement du terrorisme qui est efficace à bien des égards, particulièrement en matière de poursuite pénale, de confiscation et de coopération internationale, mais elle doit faire davantage dans des domaines tels que la supervision des professionnels impliqués dans les activités des personnes morales et du secteur immobilier.

La France a obtenu de bons résultats particulièrement dans l'utilisation du renseignement financier, les enquêtes et les poursuites en matière de blanchiment de capitaux avec une priorité donnée aux autorités compétentes de poursuivre les cas de blanchiment de capitaux de grande envergure.  Cependant, malgré une augmentation des effectifs, le manque de ressources en enquêteurs spécialisés a un impact sur les délais d'investigation, en particulier dans les cas complexes de BC.  La France doit améliorer la surveillance du secteur à but non lucratif afin de prévenir son utilisation à des fins de financement du terrorisme, notamment par une évaluation plus approfondie du risque de financement du terrorisme via ce secteur.

Les mesures de la France pour lutter contre le blanchiment de capitaux et le financement du terrorisme

17 mai 2022

Ce rapport présente un résumé des mesures de lutte contre le blanchiment de capitaux et le financement du terrorisme (LBC/FT) en vigueur en France au moment de la visite sur place. Ce rapport analyse le niveau d’efficacité et de conformité avec les 40 Recommandations du GAFI du dispositif français de LBC/FT, et émet des recommandations en vue de renforcer ce dispositif.
En savoir plus et télécharger le rapport

Notations

Conformité technique

France Évaluation Mutuelle- 2022

R.1 - Assessing risk & applying risk-based approach
LC
R.2 - National cooperation and coordination
C
R.3 - Money laundering offence
C
R.4 - Confiscation and provisional measures
C
R.5 - Terrorist financing offence
C
R.6 - Targeted financial sanctions related to terrorism & terrorist financing
LC
R.7 - Targeted financial sanctions related to proliferation
C
R.8 - Non-profit organisations
PC
R.9 - Financial institution secrecy laws
C
R.10 - Customer due diligence
LC
R.11 - Record keeping
C
R.12 - Politically exposed persons
PC
R.13 - Correspondent banking
PC
R.14 - Money or value transfer services
C
R.15 - New technologies
LC
R.16 - Wire transfers
LC
R.17 - Reliance on third parties
C
R.18 - Internal controls and foreign branches and subsidiaries
LC
R.19 - Higher-risk countries
LC
R.20 - Reporting of suspicious transactions
LC
R.21 - Tipping-off and confidentiality
C
R.22 - DNFBPs: Customer due diligence
LC
R.23 - DNFBPs: Other measures
LC
R.24 - Transparency and beneficial ownership of legal persons
LC
R.25 - Transparency and beneficial ownership of legal arrangements
LC
R.26 - Regulation and supervision of financial institutions
LC
R.27 - Powers of supervisors
C
R.28 - Regulation and supervision of DNFBPs
LC
R.29 - Financial intelligence units
LC
R.30 - Responsibilities of law enforcement and investigative authorities
C
R.31 - Powers of law enforcement and investigative authorities
C
R.32 - Cash couriers
LC
R.33 - Statistics
LC
R.34 - Guidance and feedback
C
R.35- Sanctions
C
R.36 - International instruments
C
R.37 - Mutual legal assistance
C
R.38 - Mutual legal assistance: freezing and confiscation
C
R.39 - Extradition
C
R.40 - Other forms of international cooperation
LC
  • C = conforme (compliant)
  • LC = en grande partie conforme (largely compliant)
  • PC = partiellement conforme (partially compliant)
  • NC = non conforme (non-compliant)

Efficacité 

France Évaluation Mutuelle- 2022

IO1
SE
IO2
HE
IO3
ME
IO4
ME
IO5
SE
IO6
SE
IO7
SE
IO8
HE
IO9
HE
IO10
SE
IO11
SE
  • HE = niveau d'efficacité élevé (high level of effectiveness)
  • SE = niveau d'efficacité significatif (substantial level of effectiveness) 
  • ME = niveau d'efficacité modéré (moderate level of effectiveness)
  • LE = niveau d'efficacité faible (low level of effectiveness)

Publications connexes

  • 9 janv. 2020

    FATF Supervisors’ Forum on supervising virtual assets – Paris, France, 9 January 2020 On 9 January 2020, supervisors from around the world met to discuss how to supervise and regulate virtual assets and virtual asset service providers VASPs.

  • 26 avr. 2018

    Blocking terrorists' financial flows: Next steps Speech by FATF President Santiago Otamendi at the International conference on combating the financing of Daesh and Al-Qaeda, organised by President Macron and the French government on 25-26 April 2018.

  • 25 févr. 2015

    FATF Plenary meeting opens with terrorist financing high on the agenda The three-day Plenary meeting of the FATF started today with a speech by Mr. Michel Sapin, French Minister of Finance and Public Accounts. The FATF Plenary meeting brings together representatives from the FATF Global network of over 190 countries. This meeting will have a particular focus on the issue of terrorist financing, and the financing of terrorist organisation ISIL.

  • 25 juin 2011

    Outcomes of the FATF Plenary meeting, Amsterdam, 23-25 June 2010 The Chairman's summary provides an overview of the major outcomes of the Plenary, during which India became a full member of the FATF and the mutual evaluations of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, India and Brazil were approved.

  • 25 févr. 2011

    Mutual Evaluation of France The FATF has completed and adopted the third mutual evaluation of the AML/CFT system in France. France has over the past several years continually strengthened, refined and expanded its system. France’s overall degree of compliance with the FATF 40+9 Recommendations is very high, particularly in the financial sector and in the legal area. France should now focus its efforts on certain non-financial professions that still have to improve their level of compliance with the standards. Taking into account the high quality and overall effectiveness of the French system, France will henceforth report back to the FATF on a biennial basis on the further evolution of its AML/CFT system which now ranks as one of the most robust in the FATF.

  • 25 févr. 2011

    Outcomes of the FATF Plenary meeting, Paris, 23-25 February 2011 The Chairman's summary provides an overview of the major outcomes of the meeting of the FATF Plenary, during which the mutual evaluations of France and the Netherlands were approved.

  • 22 oct. 2010

    Outcomes of the FATF Plenary meeting, Paris, 20-22 October 2010 The Chairman's summary provides an overview of the major outcomes of the meeting of the FATF Plenary, during which the mutual evaluation of Argentina was approved, as well as follow-up reports of the Kingdom of Denmark, Spain and Sweden. The FATF Plenary also provided an update on AML/CFT improvements in Qatar and Azerbaijan

  • 1 juil. 2005

    FATF Annual Report 2004-2005 During the sixteenth FATF Plenary year, under the French Presidency, the FATF focused on widening the community of jurisdictions committed to fighting money laundering and terrorist financing. The FATF also commenced the third round of mutual evaluations.

  • 13 mai 1991

    FATF Annual Report 1990-1991 Under the French presidency, the delegations agreed to continue the FATF for a period of five years and delegations agreed on the four ongoing tasks for the FATF for the years ahead.

  • 2 juil. 1990

    First FATF Report on the extent and nature of the money laundering process and FATF Recommendations to combat money laundering A year after its creation in July 1989, the FATF, under the French presidency, presents the 40 FATF Recommendations: a set of action steps that constitute a minimal standard in the fight against money laundering. The reports also includes an analysis of the money laundering process and a presentation of the international instruments and national programs already in place to combat money laundering.